<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 286 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93661</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in the challenge against the imposition of anti-dumping duty in Indian rupee terms instead of US dollars. The Tribunal modified the notification to specify the duty amounts in US dollars for different countries and territories, aligning with the appellants&#039; argument for maintaining protection against exchange rate fluctuations. The decision was based on the principle that anti-dumping duty should be fixed in dollar terms to safeguard domestic industries from erosion of protection due to changes in exchange rates. The objections raised by the Interested Parties were dismissed as beyond their competence in the appeal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 286 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93661</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in the challenge against the imposition of anti-dumping duty in Indian rupee terms instead of US dollars. The Tribunal modified the notification to specify the duty amounts in US dollars for different countries and territories, aligning with the appellants&#039; argument for maintaining protection against exchange rate fluctuations. The decision was based on the principle that anti-dumping duty should be fixed in dollar terms to safeguard domestic industries from erosion of protection due to changes in exchange rates. The objections raised by the Interested Parties were dismissed as beyond their competence in the appeal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>