<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 254 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93654</link>
    <description>Natural justice required a personal hearing before reassessing annual production capacity, especially where the authorities relied on data different from that furnished by the appellant and did not apply the prescribed formula under the relevant rules. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for reconsideration after granting a hearing and for passing fresh orders in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 254 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93654</link>
      <description>Natural justice required a personal hearing before reassessing annual production capacity, especially where the authorities relied on data different from that furnished by the appellant and did not apply the prescribed formula under the relevant rules. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for reconsideration after granting a hearing and for passing fresh orders in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>