https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93650 Magnesium oxide was held not classifiable under Chapter 28 Heading 2825 because Chapter 28 Note 3 expressly excluded magnesium oxide, and Note 1 to Section 6 did not bring it within that chapter's scope. Applying the tariff notes together, the product could not be placed under the Revenue's claimed heading in Chapter 28. The assessee's classification under Tariff Heading 2505 was therefore accepted, and the competing classification was rejected. en-us Thu, 22 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:23:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93650 Magnesium oxide was held not classifiable under Chapter 28 Heading 2825 because Chapter 28 Note 3 expressly excluded magnesium oxide, and Note 1 to Section 6 did not bring it within that chapter's scope. Applying the tariff notes together, the product could not be placed under the Revenue's claimed heading in Chapter 28. The assessee's classification under Tariff Heading 2505 was therefore accepted, and the competing classification was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93650