<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 244 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93644</link>
    <description>Suppression and misdeclaration concerning non-return of scrap generated by job workers justified invocation of the extended limitation period where removal of semi-finished goods was permitted subject to return of waste and scrap; the duty demand and penalty were upheld. Interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could not be levied for a period before that provision came into force, so the interest demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:13:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 244 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93644</link>
      <description>Suppression and misdeclaration concerning non-return of scrap generated by job workers justified invocation of the extended limitation period where removal of semi-finished goods was permitted subject to return of waste and scrap; the duty demand and penalty were upheld. Interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could not be levied for a period before that provision came into force, so the interest demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>