<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 228 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93628</link>
    <description>Exhaust fans received and used in the factory were treated as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q(1) because they satisfied the principal requirement of the rule and were not included in the exclusion list under Explanation 1, Clause (aa). On that basis, denial of credit was unsustainable and the fans qualified for Modvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:21:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 228 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93628</link>
      <description>Exhaust fans received and used in the factory were treated as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q(1) because they satisfied the principal requirement of the rule and were not included in the exclusion list under Explanation 1, Clause (aa). On that basis, denial of credit was unsustainable and the fans qualified for Modvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>