<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 225 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93625</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected Reference Applications challenging the acceptance of accuracy of a private document partially and the setting off of excess vehicles against shortages. It held that the decision to set off was based on factual analysis and evidence appreciation, not giving rise to any legal issues. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evidence appreciation in resolving disputes and clarified the principles governing the acceptance of private documents and the validity of setting off excess against shortages.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:16:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 225 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93625</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected Reference Applications challenging the acceptance of accuracy of a private document partially and the setting off of excess vehicles against shortages. It held that the decision to set off was based on factual analysis and evidence appreciation, not giving rise to any legal issues. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evidence appreciation in resolving disputes and clarified the principles governing the acceptance of private documents and the validity of setting off excess against shortages.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>