<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 222 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93622</link>
    <description>Cold rolling and trimming of duty-paid hot rolled untrimmed sheets was treated as not amounting to manufacture, because the Tribunal had already decided the issue in the appellants&#039; own case by applying the Supreme Court&#039;s ratio in Steel Strips Ltd. On that reasoning, the Revenue&#039;s view that excise duty could be fastened on the process was rejected, and the duty demand could not be sustained. The lower appellate authority&#039;s order was therefore set aside. The stated principle is that a process which does not amount to manufacture cannot form the basis for excise duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 222 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93622</link>
      <description>Cold rolling and trimming of duty-paid hot rolled untrimmed sheets was treated as not amounting to manufacture, because the Tribunal had already decided the issue in the appellants&#039; own case by applying the Supreme Court&#039;s ratio in Steel Strips Ltd. On that reasoning, the Revenue&#039;s view that excise duty could be fastened on the process was rejected, and the duty demand could not be sustained. The lower appellate authority&#039;s order was therefore set aside. The stated principle is that a process which does not amount to manufacture cannot form the basis for excise duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>