<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 324 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93613</link>
    <description>Concurrent availment of small-scale and general or concessional excise exemptions was unavailable for the same clearances where the taxpayer had already claimed the small-scale exemption and the notifications did not permit combined benefit. Notification No. 1/93-C.E. provided small-scale exemption, while Notification No. 70/93-C.E. applied general exemption or concessional rates to specified Chapter 90 goods. The claimed concurrent benefit was therefore denied, and the appeal failed on merits. The governing principle is that differently operating exemption notifications cannot be simultaneously applied to identical clearances unless their terms or the relevant facts expressly allow cumulative benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:26:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 324 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93613</link>
      <description>Concurrent availment of small-scale and general or concessional excise exemptions was unavailable for the same clearances where the taxpayer had already claimed the small-scale exemption and the notifications did not permit combined benefit. Notification No. 1/93-C.E. provided small-scale exemption, while Notification No. 70/93-C.E. applied general exemption or concessional rates to specified Chapter 90 goods. The claimed concurrent benefit was therefore denied, and the appeal failed on merits. The governing principle is that differently operating exemption notifications cannot be simultaneously applied to identical clearances unless their terms or the relevant facts expressly allow cumulative benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>