https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93604 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed on the appellants due to a discrepancy in stock figures, citing insufficient evidence without corroborative support. Despite the increased penalty on remand, the authorities failed to consider the Tribunal's directive to evaluate crucial bank correspondence. The orders lacked addressing the evidentiary insufficiency, leading to the appeal's success. en-us Wed, 24 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:06:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93604 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed on the appellants due to a discrepancy in stock figures, citing insufficient evidence without corroborative support. Despite the increased penalty on remand, the authorities failed to consider the Tribunal's directive to evaluate crucial bank correspondence. The orders lacked addressing the evidentiary insufficiency, leading to the appeal's success. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93604