<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 313 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93602</link>
    <description>A prima facie view of eligibility under Notification No. 88/88-C.E. supported partial waiver of pre-deposit, because the manufacturing location had not clearly ceased to be a village merely by inclusion within municipal limits and the packing materials appeared to fall within the notification&#039;s relevant entry. The claim of financial hardship was not backed by evidence, so full waiver was not justified. Partial pre-deposit was therefore directed, with the balance of duty and penalty stayed for recovery purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:05:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 313 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93602</link>
      <description>A prima facie view of eligibility under Notification No. 88/88-C.E. supported partial waiver of pre-deposit, because the manufacturing location had not clearly ceased to be a village merely by inclusion within municipal limits and the packing materials appeared to fall within the notification&#039;s relevant entry. The claim of financial hardship was not backed by evidence, so full waiver was not justified. Partial pre-deposit was therefore directed, with the balance of duty and penalty stayed for recovery purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>