https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93592 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Original confirming duty and penalty on the emergence of an excisable product after the installation of weigh bridges in CKD condition. The Tribunal held that the weigh bridge was already a complete product in SKD condition when cleared by the supplier, and its mere erection and commissioning at the appellants' site did not create a new excisable product. Relying on legal precedents, including decisions by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Tribunal concluded that the assessment of duty post-installation was unwarranted, providing consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Tue, 23 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93592 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Original confirming duty and penalty on the emergence of an excisable product after the installation of weigh bridges in CKD condition. The Tribunal held that the weigh bridge was already a complete product in SKD condition when cleared by the supplier, and its mere erection and commissioning at the appellants' site did not create a new excisable product. Relying on legal precedents, including decisions by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Tribunal concluded that the assessment of duty post-installation was unwarranted, providing consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 23 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93592