<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 294 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93583</link>
    <description>Duty on goods found short from the RG-1 register was sustained where the shortage was admitted at the spot, the duty on the short-found goods was debited the same day, and the later explanation that the goods were in the factory for painting was not supported by contemporaneous evidence. The demand was therefore upheld against the assessee. Penalty under the Central Excise Rules was set aside because the goods were already accounted for in the statutory record before completion of manufacture and no cogent reason or serious statutory violation was shown to justify a punitive consequence. The assessee succeeded only on the penalty issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:01:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 294 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93583</link>
      <description>Duty on goods found short from the RG-1 register was sustained where the shortage was admitted at the spot, the duty on the short-found goods was debited the same day, and the later explanation that the goods were in the factory for painting was not supported by contemporaneous evidence. The demand was therefore upheld against the assessee. Penalty under the Central Excise Rules was set aside because the goods were already accounted for in the statutory record before completion of manufacture and no cogent reason or serious statutory violation was shown to justify a punitive consequence. The assessee succeeded only on the penalty issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>