<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 286 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93575</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reiterated that where the same dispute had already been finally decided in the assessee&#039;s own case, the earlier conclusion should be followed. Applying that principle, it treated the disputed T.C. materials, E.G. strippers, T.C. set materials, D.P. set materials and S.T. supports as not goods and therefore not liable to duty. The order remitting the matter for de novo consideration was set aside, and relief was granted on the duty liability issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:43:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 286 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93575</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reiterated that where the same dispute had already been finally decided in the assessee&#039;s own case, the earlier conclusion should be followed. Applying that principle, it treated the disputed T.C. materials, E.G. strippers, T.C. set materials, D.P. set materials and S.T. supports as not goods and therefore not liable to duty. The order remitting the matter for de novo consideration was set aside, and relief was granted on the duty liability issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>