<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 278 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93567</link>
    <description>Import of watch cases without backs, together with separate watch backs but without rings, was treated as import of incomplete watch cases and only parts of watch cases. Because such parts were permissible free of restriction, the filing of separate bills of entry on the same day did not convert them into complete watch cases for import-control purposes. A special licence was therefore not required, and the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty were held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:29:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 278 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93567</link>
      <description>Import of watch cases without backs, together with separate watch backs but without rings, was treated as import of incomplete watch cases and only parts of watch cases. Because such parts were permissible free of restriction, the filing of separate bills of entry on the same day did not convert them into complete watch cases for import-control purposes. A special licence was therefore not required, and the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty were held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>