<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 268 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93558</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai waived penalties of Rs. 3 lakhs on Prakash Jain and Rs. 1 lakh on Shantilal Jain under section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, due to arguments that the gold ornaments seized might have been legally imported. The tribunal stayed the recovery of the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:19:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 268 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93558</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai waived penalties of Rs. 3 lakhs on Prakash Jain and Rs. 1 lakh on Shantilal Jain under section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, due to arguments that the gold ornaments seized might have been legally imported. The tribunal stayed the recovery of the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>