https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93556 The Tribunal set aside the lower appellate authority's orders due to non-compliance with natural justice principles. The Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal based solely on failure to pre-deposit, without granting a personal hearing or considering financial hardship evidence. The interim stay order was deemed illegal. The final order was unsustainable as it relied on the flawed interim stay order. The case was remanded for a fresh decision, instructing the Commissioner to provide a speaking order on the stay application and grant a fair hearing. This ensured the appellants' appeal would be considered on its merits following due process. en-us Thu, 04 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:16:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93556 The Tribunal set aside the lower appellate authority's orders due to non-compliance with natural justice principles. The Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal based solely on failure to pre-deposit, without granting a personal hearing or considering financial hardship evidence. The interim stay order was deemed illegal. The final order was unsustainable as it relied on the flawed interim stay order. The case was remanded for a fresh decision, instructing the Commissioner to provide a speaking order on the stay application and grant a fair hearing. This ensured the appellants' appeal would be considered on its merits following due process. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93556