https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93546 Detention of the factory or goods was held to have no bearing on a stay application under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, because the stay request was independent of any recovery proceedings in which detention may have been ordered. The request for modification was not accepted on the basis of any exceptional circumstance arising from the earlier omission to raise the fact, but relief was granted in the interest of justice for compliance purposes. The stay order was therefore modified so that it would not be enforced during the one-month period allowed for compliance. en-us Thu, 27 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:12:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93546 Detention of the factory or goods was held to have no bearing on a stay application under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, because the stay request was independent of any recovery proceedings in which detention may have been ordered. The request for modification was not accepted on the basis of any exceptional circumstance arising from the earlier omission to raise the fact, but relief was granted in the interest of justice for compliance purposes. The stay order was therefore modified so that it would not be enforced during the one-month period allowed for compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93546