<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 283 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93542</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the stay petition and the appeal, emphasizing the mandatory nature of Section 35B(2) for authorizing appeals to the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai under the Central Excise Act. It highlighted the importance of careful consideration and adherence to legal provisions, based on a Supreme Court precedent, to prevent a casual approach in challenging orders. The judgment stressed the significance of proper documentation and instructions within the Commissionerate for appeals, ensuring procedural correctness and diligence in excise matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:00:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 283 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93542</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the stay petition and the appeal, emphasizing the mandatory nature of Section 35B(2) for authorizing appeals to the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai under the Central Excise Act. It highlighted the importance of careful consideration and adherence to legal provisions, based on a Supreme Court precedent, to prevent a casual approach in challenging orders. The judgment stressed the significance of proper documentation and instructions within the Commissionerate for appeals, ensuring procedural correctness and diligence in excise matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>