<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 276 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93535</link>
    <description>Refund claims under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act must be filed within six months from the relevant date of payment. Where the amounts were reversed and paid on 29-3-1995 and 25-5-1995, a refund application filed on 16-6-1997 was beyond limitation. The argument that a later public notice should be treated as the relevant date was rejected, as it did not extend or reset the statutory period. The refund claim was therefore time-barred and its rejection was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:44:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 276 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93535</link>
      <description>Refund claims under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act must be filed within six months from the relevant date of payment. Where the amounts were reversed and paid on 29-3-1995 and 25-5-1995, a refund application filed on 16-6-1997 was beyond limitation. The argument that a later public notice should be treated as the relevant date was rejected, as it did not extend or reset the statutory period. The refund claim was therefore time-barred and its rejection was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>