<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 272 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93531</link>
    <description>Cylindrical vertical tanks used for storing chemicals during the manufacturing process were treated as capital goods eligible for Modvat credit. The Tribunal relied on its consistent earlier view that equipment or parts of plant used in processing goods can qualify for such credit, and the Commissioner (Appeals) followed that precedent. The assessee&#039;s entitlement to Modvat credit was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:34:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 272 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93531</link>
      <description>Cylindrical vertical tanks used for storing chemicals during the manufacturing process were treated as capital goods eligible for Modvat credit. The Tribunal relied on its consistent earlier view that equipment or parts of plant used in processing goods can qualify for such credit, and the Commissioner (Appeals) followed that precedent. The assessee&#039;s entitlement to Modvat credit was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>