https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93520 Restoration of an appeal dismissed for non-compliance with a stay order was refused because the appellant neither deposited the duty within the stipulated time nor sought modification or rectification of the stay direction. The Tribunal noted repeated adjournments, absence when the matter was called, and the explicit warning that failure to comply would result in dismissal without further notice. On that factual basis, the dismissal was treated as justified under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, and the appeal's restoration was rejected. en-us Wed, 05 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:05:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93520 Restoration of an appeal dismissed for non-compliance with a stay order was refused because the appellant neither deposited the duty within the stipulated time nor sought modification or rectification of the stay direction. The Tribunal noted repeated adjournments, absence when the matter was called, and the explicit warning that failure to comply would result in dismissal without further notice. On that factual basis, the dismissal was treated as justified under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, and the appeal's restoration was rejected. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 05 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93520