https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93519 The Tribunal acknowledged the additional written submissions but upheld the original order, emphasizing a comprehensive review of all submissions, both written and oral. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's concerns regarding the interpretation of the word 'manufacture' in the Exemption Notification, stating that the decision was based on thorough consideration and legal precedent. The ROM Application was denied as there was no mistake apparent on the face of the Final Order. en-us Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:04:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93519 The Tribunal acknowledged the additional written submissions but upheld the original order, emphasizing a comprehensive review of all submissions, both written and oral. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's concerns regarding the interpretation of the word 'manufacture' in the Exemption Notification, stating that the decision was based on thorough consideration and legal precedent. The ROM Application was denied as there was no mistake apparent on the face of the Final Order. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93519