<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 259 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93518</link>
    <description>A composite appellate order disposing of a stay application and the main appeal without a separate consideration of the stay request, and without adequate opportunity of hearing to the appellants, was treated as unsustainable in law. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication after granting the appellants an opportunity to be heard, with the merits left open for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:01:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 259 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93518</link>
      <description>A composite appellate order disposing of a stay application and the main appeal without a separate consideration of the stay request, and without adequate opportunity of hearing to the appellants, was treated as unsustainable in law. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication after granting the appellants an opportunity to be heard, with the merits left open for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>