<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 254 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93513</link>
    <description>Imported ISO containers were examined under the Import and Export Policy 1992-97 to determine whether they qualified as capital goods or accessories capable of import without a licence. A container specially designed to house the ice maker was treated as an essential component of the ice-making plant, not an accessory, and remained liable to confiscation. A second container used for ice storage was found to enhance storage capacity and efficiency without altering the plant&#039;s basic function, so it qualified as an accessory and fell within the policy treatment for capital goods. The redemption fine was reduced accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:52:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 254 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93513</link>
      <description>Imported ISO containers were examined under the Import and Export Policy 1992-97 to determine whether they qualified as capital goods or accessories capable of import without a licence. A container specially designed to house the ice maker was treated as an essential component of the ice-making plant, not an accessory, and remained liable to confiscation. A second container used for ice storage was found to enhance storage capacity and efficiency without altering the plant&#039;s basic function, so it qualified as an accessory and fell within the policy treatment for capital goods. The redemption fine was reduced accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>