<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 376 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93496</link>
    <description>Electric motors were treated as capital goods eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q because they functioned as prime movers necessary for machine operation. The hydraulic tracer and flat template were also regarded as components of lathe machines used in manufacture, and the Revenue produced no evidence to displace that finding. On that basis, the goods qualified for Modvat credit as capital goods and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:54:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 376 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93496</link>
      <description>Electric motors were treated as capital goods eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q because they functioned as prime movers necessary for machine operation. The hydraulic tracer and flat template were also regarded as components of lathe machines used in manufacture, and the Revenue produced no evidence to displace that finding. On that basis, the goods qualified for Modvat credit as capital goods and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>