<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 294 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93490</link>
    <description>Appellate orders dismissing appeals for non-compliance were unsustainable where pending modification applications were not first considered and the appellants were not heard. The dismissal rested only on non-production of proof of payment, but a modification application had to be dealt with after notice and hearing. Disposing of the appeals without that opportunity violated the principles of natural justice, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:36:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 294 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93490</link>
      <description>Appellate orders dismissing appeals for non-compliance were unsustainable where pending modification applications were not first considered and the appellants were not heard. The dismissal rested only on non-production of proof of payment, but a modification application had to be dealt with after notice and hearing. Disposing of the appeals without that opportunity violated the principles of natural justice, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>