<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 226 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93472</link>
    <description>Where disputed duty on transferred inputs, work-in-process, finished goods and capital goods would prima facie be available as Modvat credit to the transferee division, the transaction is treated as revenue neutral. On that basis, the Tribunal held that insistence on pre-deposit of duty and penalty was not warranted and dispensed with the pre-deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:17:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 226 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93472</link>
      <description>Where disputed duty on transferred inputs, work-in-process, finished goods and capital goods would prima facie be available as Modvat credit to the transferee division, the transaction is treated as revenue neutral. On that basis, the Tribunal held that insistence on pre-deposit of duty and penalty was not warranted and dispensed with the pre-deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>