<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 220 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93466</link>
    <description>Prima facie entitlement to interim relief was found where cutting and stitching of the materials in question was relied on as not amounting to manufacture, and comparable classification disputes had already been decided in favour of the assessee. On that basis, the duty demand and penalties were treated as fit for protection pending disposal of the appeals, and waiver of pre-deposit was granted together with stay of recovery during the pendency of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:53:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 220 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93466</link>
      <description>Prima facie entitlement to interim relief was found where cutting and stitching of the materials in question was relied on as not amounting to manufacture, and comparable classification disputes had already been decided in favour of the assessee. On that basis, the duty demand and penalties were treated as fit for protection pending disposal of the appeals, and waiver of pre-deposit was granted together with stay of recovery during the pendency of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>