<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 224 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93459</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules cannot survive where Modvat credit has been accepted as rightly availed. The rule presupposes a violation of the excise rules, and once the appellate authority found no wrongful availment of credit, the legal basis for penalty disappeared. On that footing, the penalty was held unsustainable and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:21:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 224 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93459</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules cannot survive where Modvat credit has been accepted as rightly availed. The rule presupposes a violation of the excise rules, and once the appellate authority found no wrongful availment of credit, the legal basis for penalty disappeared. On that footing, the penalty was held unsustainable and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>