https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93444 Full waiver of the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act was not justified on the facts, even though the appellant pleaded financial difficulty. The appellate authority had already modified the deposit requirement, and after considering the appellant's financial condition, complete waiver was declined. The pre-deposit was instead reduced to a fixed amount, to be deposited within six weeks, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed. Upon compliance, the appeal was to be heard on merits. en-us Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:31:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93444 Full waiver of the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act was not justified on the facts, even though the appellant pleaded financial difficulty. The appellate authority had already modified the deposit requirement, and after considering the appellant's financial condition, complete waiver was declined. The pre-deposit was instead reduced to a fixed amount, to be deposited within six weeks, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed. Upon compliance, the appeal was to be heard on merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93444