<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 285 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93443</link>
    <description>Identical material facts to an earlier Tribunal decision justified applying the same ratio to the manufacture of polyethylene bags from plastic granules and lay flat tubings. The Tribunal treated the cited precedent as governing because the substantive product and process facts were materially the same, and it granted relief accordingly. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, reflecting the principle that where facts align with a prior binding or persuasive decision, the same legal reasoning should be followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:26:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 285 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93443</link>
      <description>Identical material facts to an earlier Tribunal decision justified applying the same ratio to the manufacture of polyethylene bags from plastic granules and lay flat tubings. The Tribunal treated the cited precedent as governing because the substantive product and process facts were materially the same, and it granted relief accordingly. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, reflecting the principle that where facts align with a prior binding or persuasive decision, the same legal reasoning should be followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>