<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 283 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93441</link>
    <description>Rule 57H, as a transitional provision with a non obstante clause, governs credit claims not covered by the general credit rules, so the six-month restriction in Rule 57G cannot be imported into claims made under Rule 57H. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that Rule 57G is excluded where Modvat credit is sought under Rule 57H and found no legal infirmity in allowing the credit. The six-month limitation therefore did not bar the assessee&#039;s claim, and credit was admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:21:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 283 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93441</link>
      <description>Rule 57H, as a transitional provision with a non obstante clause, governs credit claims not covered by the general credit rules, so the six-month restriction in Rule 57G cannot be imported into claims made under Rule 57H. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that Rule 57G is excluded where Modvat credit is sought under Rule 57H and found no legal infirmity in allowing the credit. The six-month limitation therefore did not bar the assessee&#039;s claim, and credit was admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>