<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 282 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93440</link>
    <description>Prima facie application of the Tribunal&#039;s classification ruling on waterproof tarpaulin fabric supported waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. The applicant was found to manufacture only waterproof fabric, and the coating layer was not visible to the naked eye. On that basis, the departmental material did not displace the earlier precedent that such fabric falls under Chapter 52 where the coating is not visible. The earlier order was therefore modified, duty deposit was waived, and recovery remained stayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:18:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 282 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93440</link>
      <description>Prima facie application of the Tribunal&#039;s classification ruling on waterproof tarpaulin fabric supported waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. The applicant was found to manufacture only waterproof fabric, and the coating layer was not visible to the naked eye. On that basis, the departmental material did not displace the earlier precedent that such fabric falls under Chapter 52 where the coating is not visible. The earlier order was therefore modified, duty deposit was waived, and recovery remained stayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>