<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 344 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93420</link>
    <description>Confidentiality in anti-dumping investigations was upheld, as non-disclosure of confidential domestic price and cost data did not violate natural justice. The imported Dead Burnt Magnesite with less than 4% silica was treated as a like article under a broad statutory reading, but the record did not establish material injury or a causal link for that distinct low-silica grade because it was not commercially or technically interchangeable with the domestic product. Anti-dumping duty on that grade was therefore unwarranted, and the findings were modified to exclude it from the levy while leaving the remaining recommendation undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:14:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 344 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93420</link>
      <description>Confidentiality in anti-dumping investigations was upheld, as non-disclosure of confidential domestic price and cost data did not violate natural justice. The imported Dead Burnt Magnesite with less than 4% silica was treated as a like article under a broad statutory reading, but the record did not establish material injury or a causal link for that distinct low-silica grade because it was not commercially or technically interchangeable with the domestic product. Anti-dumping duty on that grade was therefore unwarranted, and the findings were modified to exclude it from the levy while leaving the remaining recommendation undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>