<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 330 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93407</link>
    <description>The assessable value of finished goods raised the issue whether the value of customer-supplied moulds had to be included in valuation, and the apparent conflict between coordinate Bench decisions was considered significant enough to require further authoritative resolution. The matter was referred to a Larger Bench for decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:27:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 330 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93407</link>
      <description>The assessable value of finished goods raised the issue whether the value of customer-supplied moulds had to be included in valuation, and the apparent conflict between coordinate Bench decisions was considered significant enough to require further authoritative resolution. The matter was referred to a Larger Bench for decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>