https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93400 The tribunal admitted Appeal No. C/22/2000-AD despite a 167-day delay. The Designated Authority's classification of domestic and exported articles as 'like articles' was upheld due to lack of evidence supporting quality differences claimed by the appellants. Anti-dumping duties on EPDM imports from Japan were recommended based on material injury to the domestic industry, which suffered losses from dumped imports impacting profitability. The tribunal modified duty imposition from rupee to dollar terms but upheld the Designated Authority's order imposing anti-dumping duties, leading to the disposal of the appeals in accordance with these decisions. en-us Wed, 09 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:56:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93400 The tribunal admitted Appeal No. C/22/2000-AD despite a 167-day delay. The Designated Authority's classification of domestic and exported articles as 'like articles' was upheld due to lack of evidence supporting quality differences claimed by the appellants. Anti-dumping duties on EPDM imports from Japan were recommended based on material injury to the domestic industry, which suffered losses from dumped imports impacting profitability. The tribunal modified duty imposition from rupee to dollar terms but upheld the Designated Authority's order imposing anti-dumping duties, leading to the disposal of the appeals in accordance with these decisions. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 09 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93400