<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 315 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93392</link>
    <description>The manufacturers of washing powder faced duty demand and penalty under Chapter 3402.90 of the Central Excise Act. The disputed duty demand of over Rs. 7 lakhs and penalty of Rs. 50 thousand were confirmed. The case revolved around deductions claimed by the manufacturers from the sale price for assessing goods under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. The appellate tribunal remanded the case to the jurisdictional Commissioner for a fresh order, allowing the manufacturers adequate opportunities to present their case and access records for a robust defense. The adjudicating authority was tasked with examining the time bar issue affecting the entire demand comprehensively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:26:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 315 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93392</link>
      <description>The manufacturers of washing powder faced duty demand and penalty under Chapter 3402.90 of the Central Excise Act. The disputed duty demand of over Rs. 7 lakhs and penalty of Rs. 50 thousand were confirmed. The case revolved around deductions claimed by the manufacturers from the sale price for assessing goods under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. The appellate tribunal remanded the case to the jurisdictional Commissioner for a fresh order, allowing the manufacturers adequate opportunities to present their case and access records for a robust defense. The adjudicating authority was tasked with examining the time bar issue affecting the entire demand comprehensively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>