<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 281 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93378</link>
    <description>The appeal involved the reversal of Modvat credit for an assessee under the Small Scale Industries exemption. The Assistant Collector&#039;s order was set aside due to lack of detailed information, but the company was given an opportunity to provide evidence for the correct duty amount. The reversal of credit on inputs received from manufacturers and lying in process was confirmed as the company failed to prove the utilization of specified inputs in manufacturing. The judge upheld the Assistant Collector&#039;s decision based on the applicability of a High Court judgment, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:41:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 281 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93378</link>
      <description>The appeal involved the reversal of Modvat credit for an assessee under the Small Scale Industries exemption. The Assistant Collector&#039;s order was set aside due to lack of detailed information, but the company was given an opportunity to provide evidence for the correct duty amount. The reversal of credit on inputs received from manufacturers and lying in process was confirmed as the company failed to prove the utilization of specified inputs in manufacturing. The judge upheld the Assistant Collector&#039;s decision based on the applicability of a High Court judgment, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>