<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 442 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93347</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and confirming the classification claimed by the appellant under Heading 35.06. The goods were correctly classified as prepared adhesives, intended to be mixed together before use, and the extended period of limitation and penalties were deemed unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:49:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 442 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93347</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and confirming the classification claimed by the appellant under Heading 35.06. The goods were correctly classified as prepared adhesives, intended to be mixed together before use, and the extended period of limitation and penalties were deemed unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>