https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93322 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, classifying all five items under Heading 85.37 instead of the previously assigned headings. Specific items were remanded for reevaluation based on their individual characteristics and functions. The control system for a torsion testing machine was classified under Heading 9024, while the control system for D.G. Synchronisation was placed under Heading 85.37. The Programmable Micro Processor Based Controller and PID Single Loop Controller were remanded for fresh examination, and the Air Borne Data Acquisition System was also sent for further review to determine the correct classification under Heading 85.37. en-us Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:24:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93322 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, classifying all five items under Heading 85.37 instead of the previously assigned headings. Specific items were remanded for reevaluation based on their individual characteristics and functions. The control system for a torsion testing machine was classified under Heading 9024, while the control system for D.G. Synchronisation was placed under Heading 85.37. The Programmable Micro Processor Based Controller and PID Single Loop Controller were remanded for fresh examination, and the Air Borne Data Acquisition System was also sent for further review to determine the correct classification under Heading 85.37. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93322