<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 278 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93309</link>
    <description>Where vehicles are sold in public auction to the highest bidder at the bid price, trade discount cannot be presumed or deducted in computing assessable value unless it is actually available in the transaction. On the facts, there was no scope for any trade discount in the auction sale, so the lower appellate authority erred in allowing the deduction. The Revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded on this issue, and the assessable value had to be determined without reducing the auction price by an assumed trade discount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:29:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 278 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93309</link>
      <description>Where vehicles are sold in public auction to the highest bidder at the bid price, trade discount cannot be presumed or deducted in computing assessable value unless it is actually available in the transaction. On the facts, there was no scope for any trade discount in the auction sale, so the lower appellate authority erred in allowing the deduction. The Revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded on this issue, and the assessable value had to be determined without reducing the auction price by an assumed trade discount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>