<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 243 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93301</link>
    <description>Duty was not demandable on PV blended yarn cleared by a supporting manufacturer where polyester staple fibre was supplied under Rule 191BB for manufacture of export goods under Notification No. 33/90-C.E. The exemption applied because the advance licence holder supplied the intermediate goods against the required release order, the quantity stayed within DEEC entitlement, and the goods were ultimately used in manufacture of exported fabrics. The intermediate processing by the supporting manufacturer did not, by itself, defeat the export-linked exemption scheme. On those facts, the demand under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:11:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 243 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93301</link>
      <description>Duty was not demandable on PV blended yarn cleared by a supporting manufacturer where polyester staple fibre was supplied under Rule 191BB for manufacture of export goods under Notification No. 33/90-C.E. The exemption applied because the advance licence holder supplied the intermediate goods against the required release order, the quantity stayed within DEEC entitlement, and the goods were ultimately used in manufacture of exported fabrics. The intermediate processing by the supporting manufacturer did not, by itself, defeat the export-linked exemption scheme. On those facts, the demand under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>