https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93279 The Tribunal set aside the order for confiscation and imposition of redemption fine and penalty, allowing the appeals for the appellants who imported Gas Can Refrigerant. The Tribunal held that imposing a redemption fine while permitting re-export is legally incorrect, as it would contradict the purpose of re-export. Citing precedents, the Tribunal concluded that simultaneous imposition of a fine and directing re-export cannot co-exist, granting relief to the appellants based on the Skantron and HCL Hewlett Packard cases. en-us Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Nov 2011 16:14:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93279 The Tribunal set aside the order for confiscation and imposition of redemption fine and penalty, allowing the appeals for the appellants who imported Gas Can Refrigerant. The Tribunal held that imposing a redemption fine while permitting re-export is legally incorrect, as it would contradict the purpose of re-export. Citing precedents, the Tribunal concluded that simultaneous imposition of a fine and directing re-export cannot co-exist, granting relief to the appellants based on the Skantron and HCL Hewlett Packard cases. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93279