<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 261 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93276</link>
    <description>Anti-dumping duty must be applied with reference to the known exporter or producer for whom a separate dumping margin has been fixed, and goods identifiable as that producer&#039;s product cannot be charged at a residuary rate. A minimum anti-dumping duty expressed in Indian rupees is not permissible where the duty has been determined in foreign-currency terms, so a rupee floor amount cannot stand. Confidential material in anti-dumping proceedings need not be disclosed, injury findings may be sustained on the evidence, and inclusion of tow within the investigation was upheld because it was treated as acrylic fibre and was convertible into fibre with minimal processing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 16:08:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 261 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93276</link>
      <description>Anti-dumping duty must be applied with reference to the known exporter or producer for whom a separate dumping margin has been fixed, and goods identifiable as that producer&#039;s product cannot be charged at a residuary rate. A minimum anti-dumping duty expressed in Indian rupees is not permissible where the duty has been determined in foreign-currency terms, so a rupee floor amount cannot stand. Confidential material in anti-dumping proceedings need not be disclosed, injury findings may be sustained on the evidence, and inclusion of tow within the investigation was upheld because it was treated as acrylic fibre and was convertible into fibre with minimal processing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>