<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 274 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93236</link>
    <description>Clearance of final products under bond without payment of duty for export was treated as distinct from clearance at nil rate of duty or of wholly exempt goods, so the precondition for applying Rule 57C of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was not satisfied. On that basis, Modvat credit on inputs remained admissible, and the contrary view that such credit was barred was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:37:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 274 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93236</link>
      <description>Clearance of final products under bond without payment of duty for export was treated as distinct from clearance at nil rate of duty or of wholly exempt goods, so the precondition for applying Rule 57C of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was not satisfied. On that basis, Modvat credit on inputs remained admissible, and the contrary view that such credit was barred was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>