<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 265 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93227</link>
    <description>Central Excise valuation must recognise different prices applicable to different classes of buyers. Contract sales to Indian Railways constituted sales to a distinct buyer class, so the ex-factory contract price charged to that buyer could not be adopted as the assessable value for goods cleared to consignment agents and sold to other purchasers. Applying the contract price to other sales would disregard the buyer-specific pricing permitted under section 4. The demand based on that valuation approach was unsustainable and quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:04:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 265 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93227</link>
      <description>Central Excise valuation must recognise different prices applicable to different classes of buyers. Contract sales to Indian Railways constituted sales to a distinct buyer class, so the ex-factory contract price charged to that buyer could not be adopted as the assessable value for goods cleared to consignment agents and sold to other purchasers. Applying the contract price to other sales would disregard the buyer-specific pricing permitted under section 4. The demand based on that valuation approach was unsustainable and quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>