<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 255 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93217</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because invoices were issued by a dealer before registration was obtained, where the dealer was otherwise eligible to issue such invoices and later secured the requisite registration. The governing notifications and Board circular permitted acceptance of prescribed invoices during the transitional period, provided they contained the required particulars and the substantive Modvat conditions were met. As the inputs were received and used in the final product without dispute, the duty-paying documents were treated as valid in the facts of the case, and the credit was sustained in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 255 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93217</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because invoices were issued by a dealer before registration was obtained, where the dealer was otherwise eligible to issue such invoices and later secured the requisite registration. The governing notifications and Board circular permitted acceptance of prescribed invoices during the transitional period, provided they contained the required particulars and the substantive Modvat conditions were met. As the inputs were received and used in the final product without dispute, the duty-paying documents were treated as valid in the facts of the case, and the credit was sustained in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>