<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 254 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93216</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the denial of Modvat credit due to a procedural lapse of not endorsing invoices for goods transferred between vehicles. The Tribunal ruled that the manufacturer is entitled to claim Modvat credit despite the lack of endorsement by the Range Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:29:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 254 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93216</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the denial of Modvat credit due to a procedural lapse of not endorsing invoices for goods transferred between vehicles. The Tribunal ruled that the manufacturer is entitled to claim Modvat credit despite the lack of endorsement by the Range Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>