<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 246 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93208</link>
    <description>Steel tubes forming an essential part of a winding machine used in manufacturing HDPE/PP woven bags were treated as capital goods because they had a direct and significant role in the production process, so Modvat credit under Rule 57Q was admissible. Invoices bearing computer-printed serial numbers were accepted as valid duty-paying documents because the goods were admittedly duty-paid and received for manufacture, and serial numbering was satisfied in substance despite the absence of pre-printed numbers, so credit under Rule 52A could not be denied on that ground. The disallowance of Modvat credit was therefore unsustainable on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:56:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 246 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93208</link>
      <description>Steel tubes forming an essential part of a winding machine used in manufacturing HDPE/PP woven bags were treated as capital goods because they had a direct and significant role in the production process, so Modvat credit under Rule 57Q was admissible. Invoices bearing computer-printed serial numbers were accepted as valid duty-paying documents because the goods were admittedly duty-paid and received for manufacture, and serial numbering was satisfied in substance despite the absence of pre-printed numbers, so credit under Rule 52A could not be denied on that ground. The disallowance of Modvat credit was therefore unsustainable on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>