<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 242 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93204</link>
    <description>Cuttings and trimmings from plywood were held not classifiable under sub-heading 4408.40 because that entry applies to plywood cuttings and trimmings in the hands of a plywood manufacturer, and the record did not show the goods were marketable as such; the factual finding of non-marketability was upheld. Phenol bonded board was held classifiable under sub-heading 4406.30 because its structure fitted veneered particle board rather than the residuary heading for plywood veneered panels and similar laminated wood under 4408.90. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to both classification findings failed, leaving the appellate order undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:49:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 242 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93204</link>
      <description>Cuttings and trimmings from plywood were held not classifiable under sub-heading 4408.40 because that entry applies to plywood cuttings and trimmings in the hands of a plywood manufacturer, and the record did not show the goods were marketable as such; the factual finding of non-marketability was upheld. Phenol bonded board was held classifiable under sub-heading 4406.30 because its structure fitted veneered particle board rather than the residuary heading for plywood veneered panels and similar laminated wood under 4408.90. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to both classification findings failed, leaving the appellate order undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>